H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Zina Garrison H2H: 3-10

Zina Garrison holds a 10–3 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 5–2 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1996 Philadelphia round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 10
13 main-draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #604 2-6 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #25 Match data Nov 14, 1996* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #20 6-0 3-6 6-3 Zina Garrison #29 Match data Oct 12, 1995* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Zina Garrison #12 7-5 1-6 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #23 Match data Aug 12, 1994* R16 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Zina Garrison #13 6-4 3-6 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #22 Match data Jun 11, 1994* SF Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Nathalie Tauziat #17 5-7 6-2 1-0 (ret.) Zina Garrison #22 Match data Jun 18, 1993* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Nathalie Tauziat #12 6-4 5-7 7-5 Zina Garrison #18 Match data Mar 16, 1993* R16 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Zina Garrison #4 6-1 7-5 Nathalie Tauziat #17 Match data Sep 4, 1990* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Zina Garrison #5 6-1 3-6 6-0 Nathalie Tauziat #18 Match data Jun 16, 1990* SF Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Zina Garrison #4 6-0 7-6 Nathalie Tauziat #17 Match data Feb 19, 1990 QF Washington Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Zina Garrison #4 6-3 7-5 Nathalie Tauziat #25 Match data Feb 17, 1990* QF Chicago Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Zina Garrison #6 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #26 Match data Aug 12, 1989* QF Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Zina Garrison #6 6-1 7-5 Nathalie Tauziat #26 Match data Aug 5, 1989* SF San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Zina Garrison #12 6-7 6-1 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #77 Match data Aug 15, 1986* R16 Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08
18 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41
19 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14
22 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77
24 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39
25 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22
30 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42 — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.