H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Neige Dias vs Kate Glancy H2H: 0-1

Kate Glancy holds a 1–0 lead over Neige Dias in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Glancy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Glancy won the 1982 Porto Alegre round of 16 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Neige Dias
BRA Age 59
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Glancy 6-2 6-1 Neige Dias Match data Apr 2, 1982* R16 Porto Alegre WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Neige Dias — — — 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Neige Dias Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,497 0 0 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 1985 6–12 33.3% — 1,527 0 0 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
19 1986 19–19 50.0% — 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1987 12–15 44.4% — 1,647 0 1 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 1988 25–13 65.8% — 1,712 0 2 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 1989 9–10 47.4% — 1,673 0 2 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Neige Dias Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Neige Dias Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1493 96.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1497 97.5 — — — — — +31 — 50.0% -0.63 — — — +0.58 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 1984 1482 98.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.16 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.25
18 1985 1528 114.5 — — — — +21 +57 — 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55 1978 1461 102.2 — — — — +124 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.21
19 1986 1611 116.1 — — — — +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 1648 123.5 — — — — -61 +20 — 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34 1980 1422 87.2 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.30
21 1988 1712 129.5 — — — — -100 +84 — 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97 1981 1423 99.0 — — — — +111 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.44
22 1989 1674 112.9 — — — — — +55 — 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +26 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.49
Career — 1749 122.0 — — — — -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29 — 1582 100.7 — — — — +69 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.