H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Neige Dias vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-1

Kate Gompert holds a 1–0 lead over Neige Dias in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1989 Boca Raton round of 64 6-7 6-2 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Gompert 6-7 6-2 6-2 Neige Dias Match data Mar 15, 1989* R64 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Neige Dias 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kate Gompert #316 #18 34 1,871 85 81 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Neige Dias Kate Gompert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 2–3 40.0% 1,493 0 0
15 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,497 0 0
17 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0 1980 3–2 60.0% 1,538 0 0
18 1985 6–12 33.3% 1,527 0 0 1981 4–3 57.1% 1,583 0 0
19 1986 19–19 50.0% 1,610 0 0 1982 7–7 50.0% 1,588 0 0
20 1987 12–15 44.4% 1,647 0 1 1983 6–3 66.7% 1,672 0 0
21 1988 25–13 65.8% 1,712 0 2 1984 4–5 44.4% #98 1,651 0 0
22 1989 9–10 47.4% 1,673 0 2 1985 11–8 57.9% 1,724 0 0
23 1986 21–21 50.0% #35 1,781 0 0
24 1987 25–18 58.1% #22 1,830 0 0
26 1989 3–11 21.4% #175 1,659 0 0
27 1990 1–3 25.0% #301 1,621 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Neige Dias Kate Gompert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 6 6 12 50.0%
20 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1986 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
24 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 37 38 75 49.3% 26 18 44 59.1% 0 6 6 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Neige Dias Kate Gompert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1493 96.1 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 -0.12
15 1982 1497 97.5 +31 50.0% -0.63 +0.58
17 1984 1482 98.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.16 1980 1539 117.9 60.0% +0.90 0–1 -0.24
18 1985 1528 114.5 +21 +57 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55 1981 1584 114.4 +12 60.0% +0.73 0–1 -0.14
19 1986 1611 116.1 +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40 1982 1588 109.9 -24 56.0% +0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +1.45
20 1987 1648 123.5 -61 +20 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34 1983 1673 129.7 -18 -62 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.11
21 1988 1712 129.5 -100 +84 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97 1984 1651 117.2 -40 -19 50.0% +0.55 1–3 (25%) 1–0 +0.68
22 1989 1674 112.9 +55 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66 1985 1725 135.5 -45 -15 60.0% +0.80 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +1.32
23 1986 1781 143.3 +2 -61 -244 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 100.8 -3.20
24 1987 1830 154.9 -15 +13 56.4% +0.64 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 -2.21
26 1989 1659 99.4 +9 +88 22.6% -1.94 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.02
27 1990 1622 106.2 +31 33.3% -1.00 +0.25
Career 1749 122.0 -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29 1871 143.4 -12 -7 -244 51.7% +0.26 19–19 (50%) 8–16 (33%) 97.5 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.