H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Neige Dias vs Monica Lundqvist H2H: 1-0

Neige Dias holds a 1–0 lead over Monica Lundqvist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neige Dias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1986 Barcelona round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Neige Dias
BRA Age 59
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Monica Lundqvist
SWE Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neige Dias 6-0 6-0 Monica Lundqvist Match data May 8, 1986* R32 Barcelona WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Neige Dias — — — 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Monica Lundqvist — — — 1,568 10 11 47.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Neige Dias Monica Lundqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 6–12 33.3% — 1,527 0 0 1985 7–4 63.6% — 1,550 0 0
19 1986 19–19 50.0% — 1,610 0 0 1986 3–6 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
20 1987 12–15 44.4% — 1,647 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,507 0 0
21 1988 25–13 65.8% — 1,712 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1989 9–10 47.4% — 1,673 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Neige Dias Monica Lundqvist
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Neige Dias Monica Lundqvist
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1493 96.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1497 97.5 — — — — — +31 — 50.0% -0.63 — — — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1482 98.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1528 114.5 — — — — +21 +57 — 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55 1985 1550 118.2 — — — — — — — 62.5% +1.33 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.02
19 1986 1611 116.1 — — — — +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40 1986 1524 99.6 — — — — +48 — — 40.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.19
20 1987 1648 123.5 — — — — -61 +20 — 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34 1987 1507 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.22
21 1988 1712 129.5 — — — — -100 +84 — 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1989 1674 112.9 — — — — — +55 — 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1749 122.0 — — — — -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29 — 1568 108.5 — — — — +48 — — 50.0% +0.08 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +6.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.