H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nerida Gregory vs Mimi Wikstedt H2H: 2-1
Nerida Gregory holds a 2–1 lead over Mimi Wikstedt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nerida Gregory leads 2–0 on clay, while Mimi Wikstedt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nerida Gregory won the 1981 Bastad fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 70
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1981* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nerida Gregory | 6-2 7-6 | Mimi Wikstedt | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1980* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nerida Gregory | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Mimi Wikstedt | Match data |
| Jun 3, 1977* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Mimi Wikstedt | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Nerida Gregory | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nerida Gregory | — | — | — | 1,647 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mimi Wikstedt | — | — | — | 1,600 | 52 | 97 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nerida Gregory | Mimi Wikstedt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |