H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nicole Arendt vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 2-1
Nicole Arendt holds a 2–1 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Arendt leads 2–0 on grass, while Kimberly Po Messerli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Arendt won the 1995 Eastbourne second round 5-7 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Nicole Arendt | 5-7 7-5 7-5 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Nicole Arendt | 6-1 6-1 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 7-6(2) 7-6(10) | Nicole Arendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Arendt | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |