H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nicole Arendt vs Nancy Feber H2H: 0-1

Nancy Feber holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Arendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nancy Feber won the 1995 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-1.

USA Age 57 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Feber #104 6-3 6-1 Nicole Arendt #103 Match data Jun 28, 1995* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Arendt #433 #49 487 1,775 67 75 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Arendt Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 2–2 50.0% #164 1,537 0 0 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1987 0–1 0.0% #366 1,519 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1991 1–2 33.3% #218 1,523 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1992 4–4 50.0% #124 1,570 0 0
23 1993 12–15 44.4% #88 1,602 0 0
24 1994 14–12 53.8% #73 1,700 0 0
25 1995 11–15 42.3% #117 1,666 0 0
26 1996 9–11 45.0% #79 1,675 0 0
27 1997 9–8 52.9% #63 1,753 0 0
29 1999 5–4 55.6% #143 1,750 0 0
30 2000 0–1 0.0% #433 1,732 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Arendt Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1992 4 4 8 50.0%
23 1993 11 11 22 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 39 42 81 48.1% 6 11 17 35.3% 21 15 36 58.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Arendt Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1537 112.1 +62 50.0% +0.34 2–2 (50%) 0–2 +0.09 1992 1502 100.0 50.0% -0.25 +0.25
17 1987 1520 99.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.26 1993 1487 111.8 +51 26.9% -1.54 1–1 -0.06
18 1994 1483 105.3 -15 +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.24
19 1995 1550 117.2 -78 +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 +0.43
20 1996 1513 113.7 -89 +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1991 1523 110.9 +27 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 -0.04 1997 1516 106.1 -48 40.0% -0.70 2–2 (50%) +0.12
22 1992 1570 112.2 +24 47.1% -0.47 1–0 1–3 (25%) +0.27
23 1993 1602 130.5 +19 -10 44.6% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 1–1 +0.08
24 1994 1701 125.2 -25 -95 54.2% +0.41 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 102.1 -0.54
25 1995 1666 123.1 +1 -123 -43 43.9% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -1.61
26 1996 1676 126.6 +9 -190 +55 43.5% -0.28 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 +0.40
27 1997 1754 129.2 -82 -179 +12 50.0% -0.05 4–2 (67%) 0–1 -0.90
29 1999 1751 114.1 -192 +44 55.0% +0.25 1–1 1–1 -0.33
30 2000 1732 97.6 0.0% -4.00 -0.15
Career 1775 131.8 +2 -167 -8 47.3% -0.19 23–21 (52%) 17–16 (52%) 105.8 -1.74 1567 115.2 -40 +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.