H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicole Bradtke vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 1-2
Barbara Paulus holds a 2–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Paulus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1990 Sydney fourth round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1990* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Paulus | 7-6 6-2 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1987* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicole Bradtke | 6-4 6-3 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
| May 28, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Barbara Paulus | 6-4 6-4 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Bradtke | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 |