H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicole Bradtke vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 4-1
Nicole Bradtke holds a 4–1 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1993 Schenectady third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 6-2 6-3 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
| May 22, 1993* | Lucerne | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Nicole Bradtke | 7-5 6-4 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| May 21, 1992* | Lucerne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Bradtke | 6-3 6-1 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 6-1 6-4 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Bradtke | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |