H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Bradtke vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 4-0

Nicole Bradtke holds a 4–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1993 Australian Open round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Isabelle Demongeot
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Bradtke #60 6-1 6-2 Isabelle Demongeot #137 Match data Jan 24, 1993* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Nicole Bradtke #38 6-3 6-3 Isabelle Demongeot #67 Match data Feb 24, 1992 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Nicole Bradtke #60 6-4 6-3 Isabelle Demongeot #35 Match data Mar 7, 1990* R64 Boca Raton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Nicole Bradtke #57 6-2 3-6 6-2 Isabelle Demongeot #50 Match data May 13, 1988* R16 Berlin Open Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Isabelle Demongeot #522 #35 69 1,841 119 157 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Bradtke Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,608 0 0
20 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0 1988 19–19 50.0% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,766 0 0
23 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,687 0 0
24 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,683 0 1
25 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,626 0 1
26 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,592 0 1
27 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,541 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,546 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,529 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Bradtke Isabelle Demongeot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 7 8 15 46.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 10 8 18 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1992 3 11 14 21.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7% — 58 70 128 45.3% 30 43 73 41.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 12 21 33 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Bradtke Isabelle Demongeot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69 1984 1514 102.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.09
18 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02 1985 1520 106.0 — — — — — +7 +100 36.4% -0.95 — — — +0.76
19 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32 1986 1609 129.8 — — — — -40 -65 +53 45.8% -0.20 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 +0.38
20 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63 1987 1732 140.6 — — — — -56 -238 +22 45.2% -0.20 6–4 (60%) 0–1 — -0.92
21 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07 1988 1759 143.5 — — — — -71 -64 -55 53.9% +0.18 5–10 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.3 -3.79
22 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67 1989 1766 145.5 — — — — -4 -36 -73 53.3% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -3.59
23 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27 1990 1688 134.0 — — — — +77 -6 — 43.5% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.7 -1.98
24 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 1991 1683 123.3 — — — — +67 -79 — 52.5% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 6–1 (86%) 98.5 +0.46
25 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62 1992 1626 122.8 — — — — -19 -17 +52 32.7% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -1.74
26 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45 1993 1593 116.2 — — — — +3 -6 — 33.3% -1.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.63
27 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02 1994 1542 110.1 — — — — +37 +40 — 29.6% -1.11 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.9 +0.54
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1547 116.6 — — — — +52 -12 +36 38.7% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1530 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.15
Career — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72 — 1842 138.1 — — — — +1 -50 +21 44.7% -0.34 32–42 (43%) 24–19 (56%) 99.7 -3.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.