H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nicole Bradtke vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-3

Judith Wiesner holds a 3–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1990 Brisbane International round of 64 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Wiesner #35 7-6 6-2 Nicole Bradtke #61 Match data Jan 3, 1990* R64 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Judith Wiesner #38 6-3 6-4 Nicole Bradtke #77 Match data Oct 29, 1987* R16 Zurich WTA 250 Carpet
Judith Wiesner #58 5-7 6-1 6-3 Nicole Bradtke #91 Match data Jun 24, 1987* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Nicole Bradtke #120 3-6 6-3 6-2 Judith Wiesner #115 Match data Feb 24, 1987* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Bradtke Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0
22 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1
23 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2
24 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3
27 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Bradtke Judith Wiesner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7% — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Bradtke Judith Wiesner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09
20 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77
21 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26
22 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01
23 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28
24 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74
25 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10
26 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07
27 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60
Career — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72 — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.