H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicole Bradtke vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 1-0
Nicole Bradtke holds a 1–0 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1992 Brisbane third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1992* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 7-5 6-2 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Bradtke | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |