H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Nicole Bradtke vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Strasbourg fourth round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 1995* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-1 Nicole Bradtke #41 Match data
Apr 10, 1993* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 SF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-1 Nicole Bradtke #40 Match data
Jan 9, 1992* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-0 Nicole Bradtke #31 Match data
Jan 18, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicole Bradtke #39 4-6 6-0 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Bradtke Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8