H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nicole Bradtke vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-2
Nicole Bradtke and Laura Arraya are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1991 Berlin third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1991* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Bradtke | 6-2 7-6 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| May 9, 1990* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-2 7-5 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1990 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Nicole Bradtke | 6-3 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Bradtke | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |