H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicole Bradtke vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-3
Mercedes Paz holds a 3–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mercedes Paz leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1991 Manhattan Beach third round 3-6 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1991* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 3-6 7-6 6-3 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
| May 24, 1990* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 7-5 7-6 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1987* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Bradtke | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1986* | Singapore | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 6-4 6-3 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Bradtke | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |