H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicole Bradtke vs Monique Javer H2H: 2-1
Nicole Bradtke holds a 2–1 lead over Monique Javer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on carpet, while Monique Javer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1992 Oakland third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 58
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicole Bradtke | 6-1 7-5 | Monique Javer | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1989* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 6-1 7-5 | Monique Javer | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Monique Javer | 6-1 6-0 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Monique Javer | #746 | #56 | 20 | 1,685 | 63 | 105 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Bradtke | Monique Javer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #73 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #72 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #185 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #779 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |