H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nicole Bradtke vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 3-0

Nicole Bradtke holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1992 Eastbourne second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Nicole Bradtke #42 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #124 Match data
May 25, 1989* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Nicole Bradtke #43 7-6 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #109 Match data
May 13, 1987* Berlin WTA 500 R64 Clay Nicole Bradtke #121 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Bradtke Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1