H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nicole Bradtke vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 1-1
Nicole Bradtke and Nicole Jagerman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1991 Roland Garros second round 6-4 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Nicole Jagerman | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1989* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 6-1 6-4 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Bradtke | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |