H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nicole Bradtke vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-2

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1995 Auckland third round 5-7 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 2, 1995* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Nicole Bradtke #92 5-7 6-1 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Jun 17, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Patricia Hy Boulais 6-3 6-1 Nicole Bradtke #25 Match data
Oct 10, 1986* Taipei WTA 250 R16 Carpet Patricia Hy Boulais 6-1 6-2 Nicole Bradtke #145 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Bradtke Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1
23 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1
24 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1
25 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1
26 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1
27 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1