H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicole Bradtke vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1995 German Open second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 1995* German Open WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nicole Bradtke #51 6-2 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #31 Match data
May 13, 1992* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sandra Cecchini #40 6-4 3-6 6-3 Nicole Bradtke #37 Match data
May 21, 1988* Strasbourg WTA 500 SF Clay Sandra Cecchini #18 6-1 6-2 Nicole Bradtke #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Bradtke Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11