H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Nicole Bradtke vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 3-1

Nicole Bradtke holds a 3–1 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicole Bradtke leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1992 Wimbledon first round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Wiltrud Probst
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nicole Bradtke #41 6-0 6-3 Wiltrud Probst #58 Match data
May 1, 1991* Hamburg WTA 250 R64 Clay Nicole Bradtke #44 7-6 6-1 Wiltrud Probst #45 Match data
May 26, 1989* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Wiltrud Probst #119 4-6 7-6 6-3 Nicole Bradtke #43 Match data
Dec 30, 1987* Brisbane WTA 500 R64 Grass Nicole Bradtke #78 6-4 6-0 Wiltrud Probst #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,757 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Bradtke Wiltrud Probst
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0
18 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,570 0 0
19 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,622 0 0
20 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0
21 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,707 0 1
22 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1
23 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2
24 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2
25 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2
26 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,616 0 2
27 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,620 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,569 0 2