H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nicole Jagerman vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 3-1
Nicole Jagerman holds a 3–1 lead over Barbara Paulus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicole Jagerman leads 3–0 on clay, while Barbara Paulus leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1991 Brighton third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1991* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Paulus | 7-5 6-2 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1991* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicole Jagerman | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
| Dec 11, 1986* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Jagerman | 6-1 6-1 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
| Dec 4, 1986* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Jagerman | 3-6 6-1 6-0 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Jagerman | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 |