H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicole Jagerman vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 1-1
Nicole Jagerman and Bettina Fulco are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1991 Paris third round 1-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1991* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Jagerman | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1988* | Aix En Provence | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 7-5 6-4 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Jagerman | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |