H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicole Jagerman vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 1-0
Nicole Jagerman holds a 1–0 lead over Isabel Cueto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1989 Hamburg second round 7-6 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1989* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Nicole Jagerman | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Jagerman | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |