H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicole Jagerman vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 0-1
Mariaan De Swardt holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariaan De Swardt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mariaan De Swardt won the 1991 Birmingham second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1991* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Mariaan De Swardt | 6-4 6-1 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Jagerman | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |