H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Jagerman vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-2

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1989 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Jagerman
NED Age 59 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Joe Fernandez #13 6-3 6-2 Nicole Jagerman #108 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-3 6-2 Nicole Jagerman #104 Match data Jun 22, 1988* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Jagerman #685 #43 24 1,735 81 100 44.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,196 417 195 68.1% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Jagerman Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,553 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,765 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,896 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,947 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,985 0 0
18 1986 9–4 69.2% #106 1,606 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,125 0 2
19 1987 0–10 0.0% #206 1,479 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1988 11–10 52.4% #72 1,582 0 0 1992 51–17 75.0% #6 2,121 0 2
21 1989 13–15 46.4% #82 1,658 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,058 0 3
22 1990 12–13 48.0% #68 1,698 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,977 0 4
23 1991 10–11 47.6% #67 1,690 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,039 0 6
24 1992 9–14 39.1% #115 1,632 0 0 1996 30–17 63.8% #16 1,935 0 6
25 1993 12–11 52.2% #68 1,682 0 0 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,990 0 7
26 1994 4–11 26.7% #137 1,590 0 0 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,935 0 7
27 1995 1–1 50.0% #215 1,608 0 0 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,901 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,880 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Jagerman Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
18 1986 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 17 4 21 81.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
19 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1991 22 8 30 73.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 27 8 35 77.1% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 16 4 20 80.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 13 5 18 72.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 4 18 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
24 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1993 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 22 8 30 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — 203 91 294 69.0% 109 49 158 69.0% 55 22 77 71.4% 50 33 83 60.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Jagerman Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1475 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.18
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1554 130.0 — — — — +65 — — 50.0% +0.04 0–2 2–0 — -0.49
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1765 147.3 — — — — -82 -11 -174 54.2% +0.32 5–3 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -4.54
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1897 158.0 — — — — -60 -77 -252 61.2% +1.15 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -5.16
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1947 151.0 — — — — -47 -156 -175 68.2% +1.45 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 103.5 -2.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1986 162.4 — — — — -24 -108 -155 63.2% +1.20 9–3 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 104.1 -2.80
18 1986 1607 116.3 — — — — 0 +33 — 63.3% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 106.5 +1.74 1990 2126 168.3 — — — — +40 -229 -238 79.2% +2.17 7–2 (78%) 4–0 (100%) 107.8 +0.66
19 1987 1480 96.7 — — — — — +55 +35 9.1% -2.55 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 1991 2063 164.9 — — — — +20 -103 -62 69.6% +1.53 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 -0.78
20 1988 1582 121.0 — — — — +4 +31 — 50.0% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 106.2 +0.50 1992 2121 171.9 — — — — +33 -59 -48 69.4% +1.32 11–2 (85%) 6–5 (55%) 106.9 -1.97
21 1989 1659 133.0 — — — — -114 +87 — 45.5% -0.17 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 104.0 +0.22 1993 2058 164.0 — — — — +1 +127 -28 66.1% +1.05 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 105.3 +0.67
22 1990 1698 130.7 — — — — -75 +4 — 49.1% -0.57 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -1.74 1994 1977 147.9 — — — — +8 +146 +2 66.2% +0.96 6–5 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 99.6 +0.06
23 1991 1691 126.0 — — — — — +73 -152 42.2% -0.56 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.09 1995 2039 159.3 — — — — +38 -7 -10 64.8% +1.11 10–1 (91%) 4–3 (57%) 107.6 -0.51
24 1992 1632 128.5 — — — — -36 +72 — 42.0% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 97.4 -0.22 1996 1935 158.7 — — — — -4 +81 +198 61.9% +1.09 7–0 (100%) 2–6 (25%) 103.3 -1.36
25 1993 1683 131.2 — — — — -33 +15 — 51.0% +0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 +0.14 1997 1990 164.4 — — — — +18 +53 +117 66.9% +1.20 10–5 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.63
26 1994 1590 112.1 — — — — +10 +71 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.31 1998 1935 150.6 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 101.7 -1.81
27 1995 1608 114.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.38 1999 1902 152.1 — — — — -1 +93 — 56.5% +0.72 6–5 (55%) 1–6 (14%) 93.5 -2.78
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1881 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21
Career — 1736 132.3 — — — — -41 +52 -59 44.5% -0.39 21–21 (50%) 23–15 (61%) 107.3 -0.04 — 2197 168.6 — — — — +6 -13 -56 64.9% +1.15 100–45 (69%) 53–48 (52%) 107.6 -4.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.