H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Jagerman vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-1

Nicole Jagerman and Natalia Medvedeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on clay, while Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Medvedeva won the 1994 Australian Open round of 128 7-5 6-2.

NED Age 59 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
UKR Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natalia Medvedeva #24 7-5 6-2 Nicole Jagerman #65 Match data Jan 19, 1994* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Nicole Jagerman #112 6-4 6-0 Natalia Medvedeva #151 Match data Jul 20, 1989* R32 Brussels WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Jagerman #685 #43 24 1,735 81 100 44.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Natalia Medvedeva #387 #23 295 1,882 111 111 50.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Jagerman Natalia Medvedeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 0–1 0.0% #197 1,499 0 0
16 1988 0–3 0.0% #317 1,473 0 0
17 1989 10–9 52.6% #67 1,613 0 0
18 1986 9–4 69.2% #106 1,606 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #56 1,699 0 1
19 1987 0–10 0.0% #206 1,479 0 0 1991 9–10 47.4% #83 1,700 0 1
20 1988 11–10 52.4% #72 1,582 0 0 1992 20–16 55.6% #41 1,712 0 2
21 1989 13–15 46.4% #82 1,658 0 0 1993 24–13 64.9% #23 1,871 0 4
22 1990 12–13 48.0% #68 1,698 0 0 1994 17–21 44.7% #57 1,771 0 4
23 1991 10–11 47.6% #67 1,690 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #79 1,694 0 4
24 1992 9–14 39.1% #115 1,632 0 0 1996 6–8 42.9% #88 1,691 0 4
25 1993 12–11 52.2% #68 1,682 0 0 1997 1–2 33.3% #388 1,669 0 4
26 1994 4–11 26.7% #137 1,590 0 0
27 1995 1–1 50.0% #215 1,608 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Jagerman Natalia Medvedeva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1989 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1986 7 3 10 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 11 8 19 57.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
21 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1993 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1995 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 21 32 53 39.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 75 63 138 54.3% 15 23 38 39.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 13 12 25 52.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Jagerman Natalia Medvedeva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1499 107.2 0.0% -4.50 -0.28
16 1988 1474 99.0 0.0% -2.83 0–1 -0.09
17 1989 1613 134.5 +25 -50 53.7% +0.44 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 -0.13
18 1986 1607 116.3 0 +33 63.3% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 106.5 +1.74 1990 1699 117.8 +9 -144 -151 50.7% -0.39 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 +0.78
19 1987 1480 96.7 +55 +35 9.1% -2.55 0–2 2–2 (50%) +0.44 1991 1700 125.8 +6 50.0% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.02
20 1988 1582 121.0 +4 +31 50.0% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 106.2 +0.50 1992 1713 141.0 +46 -149 -169 55.3% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 96.0 -0.20
21 1989 1659 133.0 -114 +87 45.5% -0.17 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 104.0 +0.22 1993 1871 140.9 +13 -238 -251 57.3% +0.49 12–3 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 112.5 +1.62
22 1990 1698 130.7 -75 +4 49.1% -0.57 1–4 (20%) 2–0 -1.74 1994 1771 141.0 +49 -194 47.7% +0.03 6–8 (43%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.33
23 1991 1691 126.0 +73 -152 42.2% -0.56 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.09 1995 1695 122.1 +28 -71 42.9% -0.67 4–3 (57%) 1–1 -1.63
24 1992 1632 128.5 -36 +72 42.0% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 97.4 -0.22 1996 1692 115.6 +46 -114 -98 40.7% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.11
25 1993 1683 131.2 -33 +15 51.0% +0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 +0.14 1997 1670 103.1 +44 28.6% -1.72 1–0 +0.18
26 1994 1590 112.1 +10 +71 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.31
27 1995 1608 114.4 50.0% +0.75 0–1 -0.38
Career 1736 132.3 -41 +52 -59 44.5% -0.39 21–21 (50%) 23–15 (61%) 107.3 -0.04 1882 138.9 +29 -146 -165 49.9% +0.01 39–32 (55%) 19–27 (41%) 101.4 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.