H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Andrea Glass H2H: 1-0

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Glass in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2002 Hamburg Open round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Glass
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #41 6-2 6-3 Andrea Glass #194 Match data May 3, 2002* R32 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Andrea Glass #648 #53 475 1,638 35 85 29.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Andrea Glass
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #287 1,496 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1996 6–14 30.0% #104 1,500 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1997 3–12 20.0% #89 1,458 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1998 7–15 31.8% #76 1,509 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1999 8–12 40.0% #84 1,580 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 2000 3–9 25.0% #131 1,545 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2001 7–18 28.0% #105 1,489 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2002 1–4 20.0% #242 1,484 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Andrea Glass
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 10 29 39 25.6% 21 37 58 36.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 11 13 15.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Andrea Glass
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1496 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.20
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1996 1501 118.7 — — — — +34 +25 — 36.2% -0.89 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.20
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1997 1458 107.6 — — — — +13 +49 — 33.3% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 98.2 +0.84
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1998 1509 120.0 — — — — -67 +76 — 36.2% -1.28 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 -0.23
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1999 1581 130.0 — — — — -101 +78 — 45.8% -0.50 4–6 (40%) 0–4 (0%) 98.4 -0.26
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 2000 1546 108.7 — — — — -90 +66 — 35.5% -1.29 2–5 (29%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.03
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 2001 1490 112.3 — — — — -38 +52 — 35.6% -1.22 2–7 (22%) 1–1 — -0.64
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 2002 1485 101.0 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 1–0 0–1 — -0.18
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1639 120.9 — — — — -36 +58 — 36.3% -1.09 17–31 (35%) 9–14 (39%) 94.5 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.