H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-0

Nicole Pratt holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2002 Birmingham quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2002* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Nicole Pratt #39 3-6 6-2 6-3 Anne Kremer #24 Match data
Apr 19, 2000* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nicole Pratt #50 6-4 6-2 Anne Kremer #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2