H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicole Pratt vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 0-2
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 2001 Miami third round 6-0 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-0 7-6(4) | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-2 6-2 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 156 | 217 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |
| 31 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |