Nicole Pratt
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 9, 2005 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Na Li | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 12, 2007 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 1, 2006 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Nicole Pratt holds a 2–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2003 Gold Coast round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Pratt | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Asa Carlsson | Match data | Jan 2, 2003* | R32 | Gold Coast | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Nicole Pratt | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data | Feb 14, 2002* | R32 | Qatar Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 159 | 219 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,817 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #54 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 19 | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 1993 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1994 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1997 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1998 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1999 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2000 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2002 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2001 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2003 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 113 | 141 | 254 | 44.5% | 24 | 43 | 67 | 35.8% | 18 | 25 | 43 | 41.9% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | — | 50 | 73 | 123 | 40.7% | 59 | 61 | 120 | 49.2% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 15 | 26 | 41 | 36.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1497 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.59 | 1992 | 1485 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.16 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1469 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.71 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.50 | 1993 | 1501 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +53 | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1492 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.66 | 1994 | 1640 | 133.8 | — | — | — | — | -64 | +27 | — | 49.3% | -0.05 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | -0.18 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1487 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.53 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.35 | 1995 | 1748 | 136.0 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -7 | — | 53.1% | -0.17 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–3 (73%) | 104.2 | -0.88 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1465 | 92.2 | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | — | 31.3% | -2.06 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.51 | 1996 | 1738 | 141.8 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -54 | — | 45.7% | -0.35 | 6–9 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.6 | -1.29 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1452 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 1997 | 1666 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -20 | -109 | 42.0% | -0.69 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.9 | -1.60 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1434 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 1998 | 1603 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +34 | — | 41.3% | -0.76 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.61 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1495 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.09 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.88 | 1999 | 1659 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -52 | — | 50.8% | +0.08 | 6–3 (67%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.5 | +1.33 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1465 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +68 | — | 32.5% | -0.78 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–2 | — | +0.10 | 2000 | 1632 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +42 | — | 40.6% | -0.83 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 108.5 | -1.52 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1598 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -75 | -40 | 47.0% | -0.68 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 103.5 | +0.11 | 2001 | 1515 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | -6 | +100 | — | 33.8% | -1.31 | 1–10 (9%) | 3–4 (43%) | 89.6 | -0.05 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1631 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | -52 | -72 | -60 | 40.9% | -0.62 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.6 | -0.98 | 2002 | 1571 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | -98 | +116 | — | 50.0% | -0.22 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.1 | -0.43 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1707 | 140.8 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -131 | -117 | 49.5% | +0.03 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–6 (14%) | 98.7 | -1.74 | 2003 | 1496 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +158 | — | 33.3% | -1.22 | 0–4 (0%) | — | — | -0.08 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1720 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -112 | -58 | 51.0% | +0.14 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–1 (75%) | 106.8 | -0.86 | 2004 | 1465 | 105.4 | -0.90 | -0.66 | 0.885 | 47.3% | -55 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.71 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 30 | 2003 | 1647 | 126.9 | -0.42 | +0.77 | 0.964 | 49.1% | +47 | -102 | -73 | 43.4% | -0.35 | 10–9 (53%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.0 | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1628 | 117.6 | -0.23 | -0.93 | 0.907 | 47.8% | +15 | -55 | — | 46.9% | -0.65 | 10–4 (71%) | 9–4 (69%) | 108.4 | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 1553 | 107.5 | +0.05 | +0.38 | 1.046 | 50.5% | +30 | -50 | -13 | 30.2% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | -0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 1528 | 101.2 | -2.17 | -1.75 | 0.815 | 45.5% | -18 | — | +66 | 39.1% | -1.13 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.6 | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 1560 | 121.7 | -1.99 | -1.97 | 0.875 | 47.0% | +13 | -85 | — | 40.6% | -0.80 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.7 | -0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 1538 | 105.2 | -1.42 | -0.19 | 0.647 | 40.0% | +9 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1764 | 126.0 | -1.39 | -1.16 | 0.877 | 47.0% | +3 | -77 | -46 | 42.3% | -0.63 | 59–52 (53%) | 33–28 (54%) | 105.5 | -0.98 | — | 1817 | 131.0 | -0.90 | -0.66 | 0.885 | 47.3% | -15 | +33 | -109 | 44.3% | -0.55 | 44–55 (44%) | 27–24 (53%) | 99.7 | -1.36 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 9, 2005 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Na Li | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 12, 2007 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 1, 2006 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 28, 2002 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jan 18, 2002 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 6, 2000 | H2H |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 12, 2000 | H2H |
| Joannette Kruger | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 13, 1999 | H2H |