H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 0-1

Bettina Fulco holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bettina Fulco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1992 ASB Classic round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Bettina Fulco
ARG Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bettina Fulco #86 6-4 6-4 Nicole Pratt #165 Match data Jan 30, 1992* R32 ASB Classic Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bettina Fulco #770 #23 197 1,873 139 153 47.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Bettina Fulco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #248 1,482 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1986 10–7 58.8% #116 1,565 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1987 24–17 58.5% #40 1,735 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1988 34–21 61.8% #24 1,776 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1989 19–15 55.9% #47 1,740 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1990 9–21 30.0% #131 1,567 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1991 12–15 44.4% #76 1,621 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 1992 12–17 41.4% #83 1,622 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1993 4–13 23.5% #290 1,561 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1994 5–9 35.7% #88 1,546 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1995 6–9 40.0% #142 1,577 0 0
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 1996 4–6 40.0% #133 1,575 0 0
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #247 1,550 0 0
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Bettina Fulco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 6 10 16 37.5% 3 11 14 21.4% — — — — — — — —
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 3 5 8 37.5% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 26 45 71 36.6% 110 101 211 52.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Bettina Fulco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1986 1565 108.7 — — — — +11 +42 — 54.1% +0.59 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +2.59
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1987 1735 150.5 — — — — -167 +62 -112 55.7% +0.74 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 103.6 -1.62
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1988 1776 144.7 — — — — -219 +178 — 58.5% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 0–6 (0%) 96.3 -0.75
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1989 1740 135.3 — — — — -190 +140 — 51.9% +0.01 8–3 (73%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.72
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1990 1567 119.5 — — — — -4 +86 — 33.3% -1.33 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) 99.4 -1.41
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1991 1622 127.2 — — — — -67 +48 — 47.5% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.89
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1992 1622 118.8 — — — — -72 +70 — 40.0% -0.95 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 103.6 -0.19
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1993 1562 112.3 — — — — -38 +40 — 28.9% -1.66 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.60
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1994 1547 118.6 — — — — — +70 — 37.5% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.82
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1995 1578 113.5 — — — — -73 +46 — 41.9% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.59
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 1996 1575 112.7 — — — — — +11 — 40.9% -0.41 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 1997 1550 97.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.05
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1874 135.9 — — — — -90 +91 -112 46.9% -0.23 41–30 (58%) 16–26 (38%) 98.3 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.