H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 0-4

Chanda Rubin holds a 4–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Hobart third round 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 2000* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #21 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Nicole Pratt #57 Match data
Nov 5, 1999* Quebec City WTA 250 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #27 6-3 6-3 Nicole Pratt #60 Match data
Apr 7, 1999* Amelia Island WTA 250 R64 Clay Chanda Rubin #24 6-2 6-1 Nicole Pratt #78 Match data
Feb 26, 1999* Oklahoma WTA 250 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #28 6-3 6-2 Nicole Pratt #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1 — — — — — — —