H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 0-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1992 Brisbane fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 3, 1992* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch #85 6-3 6-3 Nicole Pratt #201 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1 — — — — — — —