H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicole Pratt vs Cristina Torrens Valero H2H: 0-1
Cristina Torrens Valero holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cristina Torrens Valero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cristina Torrens Valero won the 2001 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Cristina Torrens Valero | 6-4 6-2 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 156 | 217 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cristina Torrens Valero | #1,073 | #27 | 955 | 1,787 | 117 | 153 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Cristina Torrens Valero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #97 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #79 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #109 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |