H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 2-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 2–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2005 Amelia Island round of 64 6-1 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denisa Chladkova #59 6-1 7-6(7) Nicole Pratt #92 Match data Apr 6, 2005* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Nicole Pratt #46 7-6(5) 7-5 Denisa Chladkova #72 Match data May 20, 2004* R32 Vienna Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Nicole Pratt #102 3-6 6-0 6-0 Denisa Chladkova #132 Match data Nov 19, 1998* R32 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Denisa Chladkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Denisa Chladkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Denisa Chladkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1507 99.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — — — +0.06
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1996 1578 111.0 — — — — +7 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.27
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1997 1575 112.6 — — — — -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 +1.28
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1998 1439 95.8 — — — — +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +1.23
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1999 1636 129.9 — — — — -59 -17 — 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) 105.2 -0.19
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 2000 1643 131.0 — — — — -12 -10 — 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 99.2 +1.37
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 2001 1651 135.1 — — — — -37 +64 — 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 -2.05
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 2002 1638 123.6 — — — — -60 +75 — 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 -1.33
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 — 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 +0.29
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 -0.58
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.90
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.