H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-0

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 1998 Japan Women's Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt

AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H

1 – 0

1 main-draw meetings

Ginger Helgeson

USA Age 58 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Nicole Pratt #100	6-3 6-2	Ginger Helgeson #114	Match data	Apr 17, 1998*	R16	Japan Women's Open	Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Nicole Pratt	#1,043	#35	924	1,764	159	219	42.1%	0	0	0	0	1	1
Ginger Helgeson	#467	#29	246	1,865	94	95	49.7%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Nicole Pratt							Ginger Helgeson
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1990	1–1	50.0%	#201	1,497	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1991	1–7	12.5%	#201	1,469	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1992	3–3	50.0%	#203	1,491	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1993	2–5	28.6%	#172	1,486	0	0	1989	0–2	0.0%	#239	1,485	0	0
21	1994	2–5	28.6%	#224	1,465	0	0	1990	1–2	33.3%	#246	1,498	0	0
22	1995	0–2	0.0%	#214	1,451	0	0	1991	17–17	50.0%	#58	1,647	0	0
23	1996	0–2	0.0%	#194	1,433	0	0	1992	12–15	44.4%	#71	1,648	0	0
24	1997	5–4	55.6%	#110	1,494	0	0	1993	22–20	52.4%	#54	1,736	0	0
25	1998	4–13	23.5%	#113	1,464	0	0	1994	29–17	63.0%	#30	1,777	0	1
26	1999	15–17	46.9%	#56	1,598	0	0	1995	8–7	53.3%	#111	1,772	0	1
27	2000	17–24	41.5%	#54	1,630	0	0	1996	0–2	0.0%	#792	1,721	0	1
28	2001	22–23	48.9%	#51	1,706	0	0	1997	3–8	27.3%	#167	1,639	0	1
29	2002	23–20	53.5%	#48	1,719	0	0	1998	2–5	28.6%	#152	1,572	0	1
30	2003	17–23	42.5%	#53	1,646	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2004	21–22	48.8%	#50	1,627	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2005	8–17	32.0%	#126	1,552	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2006	8–12	40.0%	#77	1,528	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2007	10–16	38.5%	#70	1,559	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2008	0–3	0.0%	#1043	1,538	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Nicole Pratt																	Ginger Helgeson
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1990	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1991	1	5	6	16.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1992	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1993	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
21	1994	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1990	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
22	1995	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1991	9	7	16	56.3%	8	6	14	57.1%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
23	1996	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1992	8	9	17	47.1%	2	3	5	40.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%
24	1997	4	3	7	57.1%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1993	11	9	20	55.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	3	3	6	50.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
25	1998	3	8	11	27.3%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1994	20	9	29	69.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
26	1999	11	11	22	50.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1995	5	5	10	50.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2000	6	13	19	31.6%	5	5	10	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1996	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2001	17	14	31	54.8%	3	4	7	42.9%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	1997	0	6	6	0.0%	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—
29	2002	15	13	28	53.6%	4	5	9	44.4%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	1998	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
30	2003	16	14	30	53.3%	1	5	6	16.7%	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2004	17	16	33	51.5%	4	5	9	44.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2005	4	8	12	33.3%	2	6	8	25.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2006	6	10	16	37.5%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2007	6	8	14	42.9%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2008	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	113	141	254	44.5%	24	43	67	35.8%	18	25	43	41.9%	4	10	14	28.6%	—	55	50	105	52.4%	28	24	52	53.8%	9	13	22	40.9%	2	8	10	20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Nicole Pratt																Ginger Helgeson
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1990	1497	96.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1991	1469	104.6	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	17.6%	-2.71	0–1	—	—	-0.50	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1992	1492	108.8	—	—	—	—	+29	—	—	50.0%	+0.83	—	0–1	—	+0.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1993	1487	109.4	—	—	—	—	+23	—	—	33.3%	-1.53	0–1	—	—	-0.35	1989	1486	104.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.75	—	0–1	—	+0.02
21	1994	1465	92.2	—	—	—	—	+13	—	—	31.3%	-2.06	1–1	1–0	—	+0.51	1990	1498	100.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	28.6%	-2.00	1–0	—	—	-0.32
22	1995	1452	97.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.50	—	—	—	+0.06	1991	1647	138.4	—	—	—	—	-14	+44	—	48.1%	-0.22	6–3 (67%)	5–5 (50%)	106.2	-1.02
23	1996	1434	100.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	—	—	-0.01	1992	1649	128.8	—	—	—	—	+13	+33	-159	48.5%	-0.17	4–8 (33%)	6–3 (67%)	98.8	+0.26
24	1997	1495	107.7	—	—	—	—	+15	—	—	52.4%	+0.09	2–1 (67%)	0–1	—	+0.88	1993	1737	139.0	—	—	—	—	-44	-4	-162	52.6%	+0.62	7–6 (54%)	1–2 (33%)	—	-0.91
25	1998	1465	116.3	—	—	—	—	+15	+68	—	32.5%	-0.78	1–5 (17%)	0–2	—	+0.10	1994	1777	146.6	—	—	—	—	+6	-21	-203	61.0%	+0.87	5–3 (63%)	4–1 (80%)	104.6	+1.21
26	1999	1598	112.5	—	—	—	—	-23	-75	-40	47.0%	-0.68	3–3 (50%)	5–1 (83%)	103.5	+0.11	1995	1773	137.3	—	—	—	—	-13	+12	—	60.0%	+0.67	0–4 (0%)	0–2	—	-0.56
27	2000	1631	127.0	—	—	—	—	-52	-72	-60	40.9%	-0.62	4–6 (40%)	3–4 (43%)	98.6	-0.98	1996	1721	92.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	0–1	—	+0.20
28	2001	1707	140.8	—	—	—	—	-13	-131	-117	49.5%	+0.03	7–6 (54%)	1–6 (14%)	98.7	-1.74	1997	1639	107.6	—	—	—	—	-14	—	-6	30.4%	-1.22	0–1	—	—	-0.15
29	2002	1720	135.5	—	—	—	—	-9	-112	-58	51.0%	+0.14	7–3 (70%)	3–1 (75%)	106.8	-0.86	1998	1573	99.1	—	—	—	—	+16	—	—	41.2%	-0.71	0–3 (0%)	2–2 (50%)	94.9	+1.00
30	2003	1647	126.9	-0.42	+0.77	0.964	49.1%	+47	-102	-73	43.4%	-0.35	10–9 (53%)	4–2 (67%)	100.0	-0.96	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2004	1628	117.6	-0.23	-0.93	0.907	47.8%	+15	-55	—	46.9%	-0.65	10–4 (71%)	9–4 (69%)	108.4	-0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2005	1553	107.5	+0.05	+0.38	1.046	50.5%	+30	-50	-13	30.2%	-1.49	3–2 (60%)	0–1	—	-0.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2006	1528	101.2	-2.17	-1.75	0.815	45.5%	-18	—	+66	39.1%	-1.13	4–4 (50%)	2–1 (67%)	100.6	+0.71	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2007	1560	121.7	-1.99	-1.97	0.875	47.0%	+13	-85	—	40.6%	-0.80	6–6 (50%)	5–2 (71%)	104.7	-0.64	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2008	1538	105.2	-1.42	-0.19	0.647	40.0%	+9	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	0–1	—	-0.45	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1764	126.0	-1.39	-1.16	0.877	47.0%	+3	-77	-46	42.3%	-0.63	59–52 (53%)	33–28 (54%)	105.5	-0.98	—	1865	140.4	—	—	—	—	-9	+11	-127	50.6%	+0.14	23–28 (45%)	18–17 (51%)	99.4	-0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Nicole Pratt's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Ai Sugiyama	4	5	9	Jun 9, 2005	H2H
Meghann Shaughnessy	4	4	8	Feb 1, 2007	H2H
Tamarine Tanasugarn	3	3	6	Mar 24, 2005	H2H
Na Li	0	5	5	Apr 12, 2007	H2H
Amélie Mauresmo	0	5	5	Jul 1, 2006	H2H

Ginger Helgeson's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Conchita Martínez	1	6	7	Sep 4, 1994	H2H
Helena Sukova	1	4	5	Jan 8, 1992	H2H
Chanda Rubin	1	3	4	Jun 24, 1998	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	0	4	4	Apr 6, 1995	H2H
Steffi Graf	0	4	4	Mar 19, 1995	H2H