H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-0

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 1990 Australian Open round of 128 6-1 6-7(6) 10-8.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #378 6-1 6-7(6) 10-8 Heather Ludloff #171 Match data Jan 17, 1990* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Heather Ludloff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Heather Ludloff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Heather Ludloff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.