H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Ines Gorrochategui H2H: 1-1

Nicole Pratt and Ines Gorrochategui are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on clay, while Ines Gorrochategui leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ines Gorrochategui won the 1999 Birmingham round of 16 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Ines Gorrochategui
ARG Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ines Gorrochategui #92 6-1 6-4 Nicole Pratt #81 Match data Jun 11, 1999* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Nicole Pratt #90 6-0 6-2 Ines Gorrochategui #154 Match data May 27, 1998* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ines Gorrochategui #393 #19 484 1,920 109 88 55.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Ines Gorrochategui
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #240 1,482 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1991 7–3 70.0% #55 1,573 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1992 9–9 50.0% #90 1,629 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1993 21–17 55.3% #57 1,704 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1994 23–11 67.6% #20 1,917 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1995 16–12 57.1% #38 1,824 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 1996 9–8 52.9% #100 1,801 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1997 10–14 41.7% #91 1,692 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1998 0–3 0.0% #275 1,630 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1999 14–10 58.3% #70 1,705 0 0
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Ines Gorrochategui
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 7 7 14 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 12 5 17 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 27 29 56 48.2% 56 41 97 57.7% 23 14 37 62.2% 3 4 7 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Ines Gorrochategui
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1990 1482 97.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.17
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1991 1573 119.4 — — — — — +87 — 68.2% +0.77 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.03
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1992 1629 122.8 — — — — -111 +90 — 45.2% -0.57 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 +0.19
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1993 1705 129.6 — — — — -109 +60 -68 52.2% -0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–2 (82%) 109.1 -0.14
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1994 1918 149.2 — — — — -246 +4 -208 66.7% +1.21 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.4 -2.07
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1995 1824 129.2 — — — — -155 +23 -25 52.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -0.35
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1996 1801 121.6 — — — — -124 — +65 53.8% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — +0.27
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1997 1692 130.7 — — — — -34 +79 +138 46.3% -0.20 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.81
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1998 1630 96.0 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.72 0–1 — — +0.39
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1999 1706 132.0 — — — — -77 +72 +111 53.7% +0.50 7–1 (88%) 0–3 (0%) 103.6 -0.11
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1921 138.4 — — — — -131 +57 -4 53.6% +0.11 35–25 (58%) 24–13 (65%) 112.4 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.