H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Nicole Pratt vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-3
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Tokyo fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2000* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 6-3 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 6-0 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1998* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 7-5 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 156 | 217 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |