H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 0-2

Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2007 San Diego round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Katarina Srebotnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katarina Srebotnik #23 6-1 6-4 Nicole Pratt #48 Match data Aug 1, 2007* R64 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Katarina Srebotnik #53 7-5 6-1 Nicole Pratt #93 Match data Apr 13, 2005* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,851 225 206 52.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Katarina Srebotnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 2000 8–19 29.6% #120 1,449 0 1
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,494 0 1
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,724 0 2
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 2004 14–19 42.4% #87 1,604 0 2
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,753 0 4
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,834 0 4
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,743 0 4
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,622 0 4
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Katarina Srebotnik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 1 5 6 16.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 9 12 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 13 8 21 61.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 21 9 30 70.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 19 15 34 55.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 17 14 31 54.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2008 24 16 40 60.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 124 114 238 52.1% 82 63 145 56.6% 12 18 30 40.0% 7 11 18 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Katarina Srebotnik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1999 1520 114.5 — — — — -39 +131 — 48.9% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — +1.91
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 2000 1450 112.4 — — — — +44 +97 — 34.4% -0.79 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.6 +0.46
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 2001 1494 114.5 — — — — -1 +52 — 41.5% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.12
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 2002 1724 137.6 — — — — -64 -4 -229 55.9% +0.46 9–5 (64%) 2–6 (25%) 103.9 -0.69
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 2003 1682 127.1 +1.15 +0.28 1.039 50.6% -14 +27 -125 47.2% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 100.2 +0.07
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 2004 1604 113.1 -1.79 +0.77 0.946 48.8% -16 +108 -137 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 +0.35
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 2005 1754 134.9 +0.20 -0.62 0.965 49.0% -3 -80 -248 58.5% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 103.2 +0.75
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 2006 1787 145.5 +3.94 +1.32 1.169 53.1% +10 -81 -227 56.3% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) 96.4 +0.95
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 2007 1757 138.6 +2.28 +1.88 1.106 52.0% +11 -27 -168 54.1% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.0 +0.63
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 2008 1834 150.3 +5.53 +1.46 1.188 53.5% -27 +6 -230 61.6% +1.10 10–13 (43%) 4–12 (25%) 93.8 -1.10
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 2009 1744 104.1 -2.58 -0.87 0.860 46.8% -28 — — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.19
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 2010 1623 113.9 -1.08 -2.93 0.858 46.9% +1 +158 — 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.28
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1852 138.0 +3.03 +1.03 1.101 51.9% -9 +24 -194 51.5% +0.22 63–72 (47%) 32–53 (38%) 91.4 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.