H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 3-0

Nicole Pratt holds a 3–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2007 Memphis Classic round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #46 6-3 6-0 Lilia Osterloh #122 Match data Feb 22, 2007* R32 Memphis Classic Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Nicole Pratt #39 6-4 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #67 Match data Jun 13, 2002* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Nicole Pratt #51 6-2 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #53 Match data Jan 2, 2002* R32 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicole Pratt Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9% 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6% 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7% 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
33 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4% — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.