H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Linda Wild H2H: 0-1

Linda Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1993 San Juan round of 32 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Wild #87 6-0 6-3 Nicole Pratt #212 Match data Jul 29, 1993* R32 San Juan Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Nicole Pratt Linda Wild
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0
1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0
1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0
1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0
1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2
1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2
1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4
1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5
1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5
2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5
2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5
2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Nicole Pratt Linda Wild
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8%
1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Nicole Pratt Linda Wild
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09
1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 -0.32
1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 107.4 -0.67
1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 -1.52
1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.50
1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -1.90
1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 +1.45
1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) 101.6 +0.67
1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.19
2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38
2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42
2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.