H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1996 Australian Open round of 128 7-5 6-3.

AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #35 7-5 6-3 Nicole Pratt #206 Match data Jan 17, 1996* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lori Mcneil #24 6-3 7-5 Nicole Pratt #197 Match data Jul 25, 1991* R32 Westchester Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt — #35 924 1,764 160 220 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,487 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,495 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 2007 11–17 39.3% #70 1,569 0 1 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,547 0 1 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 142 256 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1993 1487 109.5 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1999 1599 112.5 — — — — -24 -76 -41 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 2007 1569 124.9 -1.97 -1.91 0.875 47.0% +20 -94 — 40.6% -0.78 7–6 (54%) 5–3 (63%) 105.4 -1.32 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 2008 1547 105.3 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +14 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.46 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1764 126.3 -1.38 -1.14 0.877 47.0% +3 -78 -46 42.3% -0.63 60–52 (54%) 33–29 (53%) 105.5 -1.15 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.