H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Maja Palaversic H2H: 2-0

Nicole Pratt holds a 2–0 lead over Maja Palaversic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2001 Miami Open round of 128 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt

AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H

2 – 0

2 main-draw meetings

Maja Palaversic

CRO Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Nicole Pratt #65	6-4 6-1	Maja Palaversic #156	Match data	Mar 22, 2001*	R128	Miami Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Nicole Pratt #52	6-4 6-2	Maja Palaversic #179	Match data	Jan 17, 2001*	R128	Australian Open	Grand Slam	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Nicole Pratt	#1,043	#35	924	1,764	159	219	42.1%	0	0	0	0	1	1
Maja Palaversic	#746	#117	310	1,509	2	10	16.7%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Nicole Pratt							Maja Palaversic
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1990	1–1	50.0%	#201	1,497	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1991	1–7	12.5%	#201	1,469	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1992	3–3	50.0%	#203	1,491	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1993	2–5	28.6%	#172	1,486	0	0	1993	0–1	0.0%	#306	1,483	0	0
21	1994	2–5	28.6%	#224	1,465	0	0	1994	1–1	50.0%	#168	1,503	0	0
22	1995	0–2	0.0%	#214	1,451	0	0	1995	0–1	0.0%	#333	1,487	0	0
23	1996	0–2	0.0%	#194	1,433	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1997	5–4	55.6%	#110	1,494	0	0	1997	0–1	0.0%	#284	1,471	0	0
25	1998	4–13	23.5%	#113	1,464	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1999	15–17	46.9%	#56	1,598	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2000	17–24	41.5%	#54	1,630	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2001	22–23	48.9%	#51	1,706	0	0	2001	1–4	20.0%	#124	1,461	0	0
29	2002	23–20	53.5%	#48	1,719	0	0	2002	0–2	0.0%	#247	1,451	0	0
30	2003	17–23	42.5%	#53	1,646	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2004	21–22	48.8%	#50	1,627	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2005	8–17	32.0%	#126	1,552	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2006	8–12	40.0%	#77	1,528	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2007	10–16	38.5%	#70	1,559	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2008	0–3	0.0%	#1043	1,538	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Nicole Pratt																	Maja Palaversic
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1990	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1991	1	5	6	16.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1992	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1993	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1994	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1994	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1995	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1995	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1996	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1997	4	3	7	57.1%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1997	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1998	3	8	11	27.3%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1999	11	11	22	50.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2000	6	13	19	31.6%	5	5	10	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2001	17	14	31	54.8%	3	4	7	42.9%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	2001	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
29	2002	15	13	28	53.6%	4	5	9	44.4%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	2002	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2003	16	14	30	53.3%	1	5	6	16.7%	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2004	17	16	33	51.5%	4	5	9	44.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2005	4	8	12	33.3%	2	6	8	25.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2006	6	10	16	37.5%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2007	6	8	14	42.9%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2008	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	113	141	254	44.5%	24	43	67	35.8%	18	25	43	41.9%	4	10	14	28.6%	—	0	2	2	0.0%	2	7	9	22.2%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Nicole Pratt																Maja Palaversic
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1990	1497	96.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1991	1469	104.6	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	17.6%	-2.71	0–1	—	—	-0.50	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1992	1492	108.8	—	—	—	—	+29	—	—	50.0%	+0.83	—	0–1	—	+0.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1993	1487	109.4	—	—	—	—	+23	—	—	33.3%	-1.53	0–1	—	—	-0.35	1993	1483	97.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-2.67	0–1	—	—	+0.13
21	1994	1465	92.2	—	—	—	—	+13	—	—	31.3%	-2.06	1–1	1–0	—	+0.51	1994	1503	107.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.25	—	—	—	+0.02
22	1995	1452	97.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.50	—	—	—	+0.06	1995	1487	98.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.67	0–1	1–0	—	+0.11
23	1996	1434	100.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	—	—	-0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1997	1495	107.7	—	—	—	—	+15	—	—	52.4%	+0.09	2–1 (67%)	0–1	—	+0.88	1997	1472	98.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.00	—	—	—	+0.16
25	1998	1465	116.3	—	—	—	—	+15	+68	—	32.5%	-0.78	1–5 (17%)	0–2	—	+0.10	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1999	1598	112.5	—	—	—	—	-23	-75	-40	47.0%	-0.68	3–3 (50%)	5–1 (83%)	103.5	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2000	1631	127.0	—	—	—	—	-52	-72	-60	40.9%	-0.62	4–6 (40%)	3–4 (43%)	98.6	-0.98	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2001	1707	140.8	—	—	—	—	-13	-131	-117	49.5%	+0.03	7–6 (54%)	1–6 (14%)	98.7	-1.74	2001	1462	99.9	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	20.0%	-2.40	—	—	—	-0.09
29	2002	1720	135.5	—	—	—	—	-9	-112	-58	51.0%	+0.14	7–3 (70%)	3–1 (75%)	106.8	-0.86	2002	1452	106.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.25	—	—	—	-0.38
30	2003	1647	126.9	-0.42	+0.77	0.964	49.1%	+47	-102	-73	43.4%	-0.35	10–9 (53%)	4–2 (67%)	100.0	-0.96	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2004	1628	117.6	-0.23	-0.93	0.907	47.8%	+15	-55	—	46.9%	-0.65	10–4 (71%)	9–4 (69%)	108.4	-0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2005	1553	107.5	+0.05	+0.38	1.046	50.5%	+30	-50	-13	30.2%	-1.49	3–2 (60%)	0–1	—	-0.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2006	1528	101.2	-2.17	-1.75	0.815	45.5%	-18	—	+66	39.1%	-1.13	4–4 (50%)	2–1 (67%)	100.6	+0.71	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2007	1560	121.7	-1.99	-1.97	0.875	47.0%	+13	-85	—	40.6%	-0.80	6–6 (50%)	5–2 (71%)	104.7	-0.64	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2008	1538	105.2	-1.42	-0.19	0.647	40.0%	+9	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	0–1	—	-0.45	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1764	126.0	-1.39	-1.16	0.877	47.0%	+3	-77	-46	42.3%	-0.63	59–52 (53%)	33–28 (54%)	105.5	-0.98	—	1509	103.1	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	23.1%	-2.12	0–2	1–0	—	-0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Nicole Pratt's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Ai Sugiyama	4	5	9	Jun 9, 2005	H2H
Meghann Shaughnessy	4	4	8	Feb 1, 2007	H2H
Tamarine Tanasugarn	3	3	6	Mar 24, 2005	H2H
Na Li	0	5	5	Apr 12, 2007	H2H
Amélie Mauresmo	0	5	5	Jul 1, 2006	H2H

Maja Palaversic's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Nicole Pratt	0	2	2	Mar 22, 2001	H2H
Paola Suarez	0	1	1	Jul 11, 2002	H2H
Fabiola Zuluaga	0	1	1	Feb 21, 2002	H2H
Anna Smashnova	0	1	1	Jul 13, 2001	H2H
Daniela Hantuchova	1	0	1	Jul 12, 2001	H2H