Nicole Pratt
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 9, 2005 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Na Li | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 12, 2007 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 1, 2006 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Martina Sucha holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Sucha leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Sucha won the 2002 Hobart International semifinal 1-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Sucha | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Nicole Pratt | Match data | Jan 11, 2002* | SF | Hobart International | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 159 | 219 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martina Sucha | #948 | #37 | 859 | 1,730 | 96 | 126 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Martina Sucha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #56 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #93 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #83 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #54 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Martina Sucha | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1993 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 21 | 1994 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 113 | 141 | 254 | 44.5% | 24 | 43 | 67 | 35.8% | 18 | 25 | 43 | 41.9% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | — | 61 | 67 | 128 | 47.7% | 27 | 45 | 72 | 37.5% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Martina Sucha | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1497 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 1469 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.71 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.50 | 1999 | 1485 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1492 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.66 | 2000 | 1527 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | +52 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.11 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1487 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.53 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.35 | 2001 | 1637 | 123.2 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -126 | — | 51.9% | +0.24 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–0 | — | +0.76 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1465 | 92.2 | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | — | 31.3% | -2.06 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.51 | 2002 | 1592 | 123.3 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -57 | +16 | 47.6% | -0.26 | 7–10 (41%) | 5–1 (83%) | 101.6 | +0.78 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1452 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 2003 | 1493 | 99.3 | -2.12 | -0.63 | 0.771 | 44.0% | +39 | -21 | — | 27.3% | -1.71 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.47 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1434 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2004 | 1611 | 109.3 | -1.31 | -3.24 | 0.674 | 42.7% | +12 | -82 | — | 48.9% | -0.17 | 8–6 (57%) | 7–4 (64%) | 105.1 | +2.54 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1495 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.09 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.88 | 2005 | 1534 | 107.1 | -2.10 | -3.29 | 0.733 | 43.5% | +18 | -64 | — | 40.4% | -0.62 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–6 (25%) | 91.9 | +0.87 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1465 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +68 | — | 32.5% | -0.78 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–2 | — | +0.10 | 2006 | 1617 | 115.0 | -2.64 | -0.86 | 0.922 | 48.4% | -19 | -90 | -113 | 46.3% | -0.31 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.8 | -0.53 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1598 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -75 | -40 | 47.0% | -0.68 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 103.5 | +0.11 | 2007 | 1551 | 108.4 | -3.53 | +0.21 | 0.853 | 46.0% | +34 | -60 | — | 38.2% | -0.74 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–1 | — | -0.37 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1631 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | -52 | -72 | -60 | 40.9% | -0.62 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.6 | -0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 1707 | 140.8 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -131 | -117 | 49.5% | +0.03 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–6 (14%) | 98.7 | -1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1720 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -112 | -58 | 51.0% | +0.14 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–1 (75%) | 106.8 | -0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 1647 | 126.9 | -0.42 | +0.77 | 0.964 | 49.1% | +47 | -102 | -73 | 43.4% | -0.35 | 10–9 (53%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.0 | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1628 | 117.6 | -0.23 | -0.93 | 0.907 | 47.8% | +15 | -55 | — | 46.9% | -0.65 | 10–4 (71%) | 9–4 (69%) | 108.4 | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 1553 | 107.5 | +0.05 | +0.38 | 1.046 | 50.5% | +30 | -50 | -13 | 30.2% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | -0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 1528 | 101.2 | -2.17 | -1.75 | 0.815 | 45.5% | -18 | — | +66 | 39.1% | -1.13 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.6 | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 1560 | 121.7 | -1.99 | -1.97 | 0.875 | 47.0% | +13 | -85 | — | 40.6% | -0.80 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.7 | -0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 1538 | 105.2 | -1.42 | -0.19 | 0.647 | 40.0% | +9 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1764 | 126.0 | -1.39 | -1.16 | 0.877 | 47.0% | +3 | -77 | -46 | 42.3% | -0.63 | 59–52 (53%) | 33–28 (54%) | 105.5 | -0.98 | — | 1730 | 116.0 | -2.53 | -1.32 | 0.835 | 46.1% | +20 | -73 | -39 | 44.3% | -0.42 | 36–41 (47%) | 19–16 (54%) | 101.4 | +2.09 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 9, 2005 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Na Li | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 12, 2007 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 1, 2006 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Schnyder | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 29, 2007 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Sybille Bammer | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 10, 2007 | H2H |
| Katarina Srebotnik | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 21, 2006 | H2H |
| Silvia Farina Elia | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 22, 2005 | H2H |