H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicole Pratt vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-4
Monica Seles holds a 4–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Doha quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2002* | Doha | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-1 6-0 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2001* | Shanghai | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-2 6-3 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-1 6-2 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2001* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-4 6-2 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 156 | 217 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Pratt | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |