H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Patricia Tarabini H2H: 0-1

Patricia Tarabini holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Tarabini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Tarabini won the 1995 Australian Open round of 128 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Tarabini
ARG Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Tarabini #106 6-0 6-1 Nicole Pratt #222 Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Patricia Tarabini #617 #29 29 1,746 105 123 46.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Patricia Tarabini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1986 8–5 61.5% #108 1,562 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1987 14–17 45.2% #65 1,627 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1988 17–11 60.7% #36 1,732 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1989 18–17 51.4% #60 1,693 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% #74 1,659 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #100 1,653 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 1992 8–11 42.1% #126 1,636 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #60 1,667 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1994 6–14 30.0% #104 1,581 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1995 1–6 14.3% #324 1,517 0 0
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Patricia Tarabini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 4 5 9 44.4% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 4 2 6 66.7% 13 9 22 59.1% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 5 14 64.3% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 3 4 25.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 22 29 51 43.1% 80 82 162 49.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Patricia Tarabini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1986 1563 113.7 — — — — — +77 — 58.1% +0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +2.12
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1987 1627 119.8 — — — — -43 +13 — 42.9% -0.30 6–4 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 100.2 +1.32
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1988 1733 129.7 — — — — -103 +8 — 57.6% +0.36 7–0 (100%) 4–1 (80%) 110.1 -0.68
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1989 1694 124.4 — — — — -24 +3 — 51.9% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 96.9 +1.92
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1990 1659 126.4 — — — — -54 +82 — 47.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 3–3 (50%) 97.7 -0.18
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1991 1654 128.2 — — — — -81 +85 — 41.7% -0.42 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.50
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1992 1636 121.0 — — — — -52 +72 — 45.2% -0.43 1–3 (25%) — — -0.08
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1993 1668 128.1 — — — — -154 +126 — 52.9% +0.14 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.16
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1994 1582 113.6 — — — — -87 +101 — 31.1% -1.64 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.59
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1995 1518 95.0 — — — — — +66 — 14.3% -2.36 — 0–1 — +0.49
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1747 128.8 — — — — -62 +59 — 46.8% -0.25 30–28 (52%) 16–18 (47%) 99.4 +1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.