H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-3

Rachel Mcquillan holds a 3–1 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rachel Mcquillan leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2001 Waikoloa round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #67 6-3 6-1 Rachel Mcquillan #62 Match data Sep 13, 2001* R32 Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Rachel Mcquillan #65 3-6 6-2 6-2 Nicole Pratt #118 Match data Sep 27, 1997* QF Surabaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Rachel Mcquillan #115 6-1 6-3 Nicole Pratt #172 Match data Jan 5, 1994* R64 Brisbane International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Rachel Mcquillan #48 6-4 6-3 Nicole Pratt #220 Match data Jan 8, 1993* R16 Brisbane International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Rachel Mcquillan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Rachel Mcquillan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.