H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nicole Pratt vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 1-1

Nicole Pratt and Rita Kuti-Kis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on clay, while Rita Kuti-Kis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rita Kuti-Kis won the 2000 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Rita Kuti-Kis
HUN Age 48 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rita Kuti-Kis #58 6-1 6-2 Nicole Pratt #54 Match data Oct 12, 2000* R32 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Nicole Pratt #82 6-4 7-5 Rita Kuti-Kis #72 Match data May 21, 1999* R32 Madrid Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rita Kuti-Kis #1,325 #47 660 1,699 58 69 45.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicole Pratt Rita Kuti-Kis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0 1996 3–2 60.0% #183 1,527 0 0
19 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #277 1,516 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,537 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0 1999 13–15 46.4% #87 1,559 0 0
22 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0 2000 20–18 52.6% #56 1,569 0 1
23 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0 2001 16–19 45.7% #78 1,579 0 1
24 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0 2002 4–9 30.8% #171 1,509 0 1
25 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0 2003 0–3 0.0% #174 1,475 0 1
26 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicole Pratt Rita Kuti-Kis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 9 12 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 2 8 10 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6% — 5 24 29 17.2% 53 40 93 57.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicole Pratt Rita Kuti-Kis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50 1996 1528 104.4 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–0 0–1 — +0.35
19 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66 1997 1516 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03
20 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35 1998 1537 112.0 — — — — — +80 — 50.0% -0.38 — — — -0.05
21 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51 1999 1559 114.8 — — — — -58 +77 — 48.4% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 97.5 +0.64
22 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 2000 1570 124.0 — — — — -103 +167 — 52.8% +0.40 6–7 (46%) 6–8 (43%) 97.7 +1.78
23 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 2001 1580 118.9 — — — — -156 +163 — 46.3% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.86
24 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88 2002 1510 100.6 — — — — -116 +129 — 35.5% -0.90 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 +0.80
25 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10 2003 1476 101.1 — — — — — +99 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 0–2 — -0.09
26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98 — 1699 119.1 — — — — -119 +130 — 47.0% -0.21 19–23 (45%) 13–20 (39%) 93.8 +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.